<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nongraphical.com &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nongraphical.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nongraphical.com</link>
	<description>A dynamic trapeze of web design, programming, and randomness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Chrome - first impressions</title>
		<link>http://nongraphical.com/2008/09/web-browsergoogle-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://nongraphical.com/2008/09/web-browsergoogle-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fyhuang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nongraphical.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here it is, fi&#173;nal&#173;ly: the le&#173;gendary Google browser.

And like ev&#173;ery&#173;thing else that Google puts out, it is a glo&#173;ri&#173;ous&#173;ly in&#173;cred&#173;i&#173;ble piece of work. It has the best char&#173;ac&#173;ter&#173;is&#173;tics a piece of soft&#173;ware could have: it&#8217;s sim&#173;ple, fast, re&#173;spon&#173;sive, and stable. I&#8217;ve been run&#173;ning it for just a lit&#173;tle while now, and while We&#173;bKit&#8217;s ren&#173;der&#173;ing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here it is, fi&shy;nal&shy;ly: the le&shy;gendary <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google browser</a>.</p>

<p>And like ev&shy;ery&shy;thing else that Google puts out, it is a glo&shy;ri&shy;ous&shy;ly in&shy;cred&shy;i&shy;ble piece of work. It has the best char&shy;ac&shy;ter&shy;is&shy;tics a piece of soft&shy;ware could have: it&#8217;s sim&shy;ple, fast, re&shy;spon&shy;sive, and stable. I&#8217;ve been run&shy;ning it for just a lit&shy;tle while now, and while We&shy;bKit&#8217;s ren&shy;der&shy;ing (espe&shy;cial&shy;ly of fonts) is slight&shy;ly dif&shy;fer&shy;ent from Gecko&#8217;s, ev&shy;ery&shy;thing works just about the same as in Fire&shy;fox&#8230; it&#8217;s all just way, way faster. Open&shy;ing new tabs is faster. Us&shy;ing Gmail is faster (thanks, no doubt, to the new V8 JavaScript engine). Writ&shy;ing posts is faster. It&#8217;s re&shy;al&shy;ly quite in&shy;cred&shy;i&shy;ble&#8230; in fact, pos&shy;si&shy;bly one of the most im&shy;pres&shy;sive open-source de&shy;vel&shy;op&shy;ments to date, right up there with Fire&shy;fox 1 and the Lin&shy;ux ker&shy;nel. <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Give it a spin your&shy;self and see</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nongraphical.com/2008/09/web-browsergoogle-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.242 seconds -->
